Quantcast
Channel: KVR Audio
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1656

Re: Two-Part Question & Request: Plugindoctor vs. UAD DSP Plugins, and Cambridge EQ Analysis

$
0
0
First image is the Cambridge with an Elpitical 6 filter at 15k. It's got a weird little ripple thing happening.
Image

Next up is the Cambridge+ProQ3 with the latter set to a 96db slope and a little bit of resonance. Doesn't quite have the ripple thing, but the slope looks close enough to me.
Image
Awesome! Thank you so much for doing this! It's cool to see the quirkiness of the filter, and it's great to know that the UAD DSP-only plugins work in Plugin Doc for analysis!

Can you please check a high-pass filter, let's say at 100Hz to confirm the same characteristics? Also, can you extend PD's range on the Y-axis to see how cleanly the filter acts in the stopband? How? I just recently discovered** this feature in PD where you can extend the Y-axis range by holding the mouse cursor over the values, holding CTRL and rolling the mouse wheel down. This is a great way to confirm filter operation down to -60, -90, -100dB, example. Double-click to reset. TIA!

Some Waves' plugins have some weird filters. H-EQ's filters is what initially got me into checking "below the line." RChannel has better, but still weak-in-the-stopband filtering. See attachment. Analog-modeled characteristics, I suppose. Pro-Q3 is about as clean as one could ever ask for.

Statistics: Posted by 2:43AM — Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:52 am



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1656

Trending Articles